2008?
Directed and filmed by Lance Hammer
with Michael J. Smith, Tarra Riggs, Jim Myron Ross
This is a beautiful, slow, low budget movie. I would NOT reccomend taking your overstimulated teenager to this film. There's lots of waiting going on.
Ok it sounds bad - lots of waiting - but it isn't. The stoic characers show their suffering and scars in mostly subtle ways. Events take time to unravel adding suspense to the viewer. The slow paced Missisppi Delta landscape is haunting and lonely. And one of my favorite scenes is watching a characer sitting in front a portable heater with his coat on inside the house. These Mississippians are poor, and the flm shows what the poverty looks like. It's not abstract in the least.
The film starts out with the suicide of the main character's twin brother. The brother takes it hard and attempts a suicide himself. He is in anguish and lets his business go to pieces. Along comes his sister-in-law with a young troubled, teenager who makes certain demands of him. Not liking the mother very well, but realizing that her son is his nephew, he is torn.
The characters, and course the actors, are all African-American. It's interesting to watch poor, troubled African-Americans in a different context then the usual urban context that movie viewers usually see them in.
Friday, December 5, 2008
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Changeling ***
Directed by Clint Eastwood,
with Angelina Jolie, Jeffrey Donovan, John Malkovich, Michael Kelly, Amy Ryan, Jason Butler
2008 140 min.
Angelina Jolie plays a single mom living in Los Angeles in 1929. One day she comes home to find her son missing. In desperation she calls the police for help, but from the 1st day they seem unconcerned saying that he probably went to a friends house. Eventually, after a long search, a boy turns up on the other side of the country in Illinois. The police think they have found him and bring him home. It is not her son, and she says so from the beginning, but they insist that he is and that he has changed. She takes him in because the boy has no place to go and besides, maybe she is mistaken because she is "hysterical" as the police say. The police insist because they don't want to lose face in light of recent scandals. Thy want to look good in the public eye. They coerce her into accepting the boy as her son though she can clearly see he's not. At one point they institutionalize her, which apparently happens to a lot of women who make too much noise.
So it's a story about police corruption in L.A. Apparently L.A. has a long tradition of police corruption. It's also a story of how a 'weak' woman (this was 1928 after all and Angeline plays the mother well - the meek and submissive mother whose singleness makes her even more vulnerable in this pre-femenist era) becomes strong. She has to learn to become strong and stick up for her self.
In the last decade or so, Clint Eastwood has become one of my favorite directors, and I always look forward to one of his "serious" films. Angeline Jolie is also getting some nice roles recently and I am duly impressed with her also.
with Angelina Jolie, Jeffrey Donovan, John Malkovich, Michael Kelly, Amy Ryan, Jason Butler
2008 140 min.
Angelina Jolie plays a single mom living in Los Angeles in 1929. One day she comes home to find her son missing. In desperation she calls the police for help, but from the 1st day they seem unconcerned saying that he probably went to a friends house. Eventually, after a long search, a boy turns up on the other side of the country in Illinois. The police think they have found him and bring him home. It is not her son, and she says so from the beginning, but they insist that he is and that he has changed. She takes him in because the boy has no place to go and besides, maybe she is mistaken because she is "hysterical" as the police say. The police insist because they don't want to lose face in light of recent scandals. Thy want to look good in the public eye. They coerce her into accepting the boy as her son though she can clearly see he's not. At one point they institutionalize her, which apparently happens to a lot of women who make too much noise.
So it's a story about police corruption in L.A. Apparently L.A. has a long tradition of police corruption. It's also a story of how a 'weak' woman (this was 1928 after all and Angeline plays the mother well - the meek and submissive mother whose singleness makes her even more vulnerable in this pre-femenist era) becomes strong. She has to learn to become strong and stick up for her self.
In the last decade or so, Clint Eastwood has become one of my favorite directors, and I always look forward to one of his "serious" films. Angeline Jolie is also getting some nice roles recently and I am duly impressed with her also.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
The War of the Worlds **
By H.G. Wells
First Tor Edition: October 1988
p. 204 including intros and conclusion
The original date of publishing is not mentioned for some reason, but in the introduction it says that the book originally came out in the decade of the 1890's. Some people (academics, fans etc.)claim that this is the original or granddaddy of science fiction.
It's an odd thing really. It's written in an unemotional, detached manner. It makes for some slow, dry reading. The horror of people getting killed and chased is told in a very matter of fact manner. At our book discussion, someone mentioned that it was supposed to be written like a newspaper article. I guess so that it seems more realistic.
Of course the technology is so obsolete that it seems very unrealistic. You would think that the Martians had some sort of computer technology if they were so advanced. The Martians' mode of communications was very crude indeed. You would think that they would come in a space ship instead of a pod being fired out of a giant cannon. It does make the book intriguing as an artifact though.
I haven't seen the movie since I was a kid, so it would be interesting to see what parts from the book they keep. To my memory, think they kept very little besides the fact that there was total destruction.
An interesting theme of the book is that it seems that Wells is comparing the Martians society to that of Imperialistic England, where the story takes place. He mentions that the Martians have no consideration for the lives of the people. That they are ruthless and that people are less than worthy - ie. less than human. Wells is saying that England needs to be more humane to societies that it is ruling. he says, "Surely if we have learned nothing else, this war has taught us pity - pity for those witless souls that suffer our dominion." In other words, we should be more humane to our opponents in times of war.
There's not much of a plot but here is a synopsis of the book. Some scientists see some explosions on the planet Mars. Those explosions are of course the Martians coming to earth. They land and wait. It seems that they are building there war machines, while humans just wait around waiting for things to happen. Then the Martians finally start their war and complete chaos, destruction and defeat happens. The Martians make their way towards London and cause a stream of refugees to vacant London in chaos where concern for fellow humans begins to deteriorate into every man for himself. It reminded me of Suite Francois which depicts the refugees fleeing Paris from the Nazis. I guess that is a fairly common happening in war time. There is a main character who kind of chronicles all of it and describes the activities of the Martians at work. As he works his way towards London to find his wife and family he learns that the Martians are dying . It seems that they have no immune system and simple viral organisms are the death of them.
First Tor Edition: October 1988
p. 204 including intros and conclusion
The original date of publishing is not mentioned for some reason, but in the introduction it says that the book originally came out in the decade of the 1890's. Some people (academics, fans etc.)claim that this is the original or granddaddy of science fiction.
It's an odd thing really. It's written in an unemotional, detached manner. It makes for some slow, dry reading. The horror of people getting killed and chased is told in a very matter of fact manner. At our book discussion, someone mentioned that it was supposed to be written like a newspaper article. I guess so that it seems more realistic.
Of course the technology is so obsolete that it seems very unrealistic. You would think that the Martians had some sort of computer technology if they were so advanced. The Martians' mode of communications was very crude indeed. You would think that they would come in a space ship instead of a pod being fired out of a giant cannon. It does make the book intriguing as an artifact though.
I haven't seen the movie since I was a kid, so it would be interesting to see what parts from the book they keep. To my memory, think they kept very little besides the fact that there was total destruction.
An interesting theme of the book is that it seems that Wells is comparing the Martians society to that of Imperialistic England, where the story takes place. He mentions that the Martians have no consideration for the lives of the people. That they are ruthless and that people are less than worthy - ie. less than human. Wells is saying that England needs to be more humane to societies that it is ruling. he says, "Surely if we have learned nothing else, this war has taught us pity - pity for those witless souls that suffer our dominion." In other words, we should be more humane to our opponents in times of war.
There's not much of a plot but here is a synopsis of the book. Some scientists see some explosions on the planet Mars. Those explosions are of course the Martians coming to earth. They land and wait. It seems that they are building there war machines, while humans just wait around waiting for things to happen. Then the Martians finally start their war and complete chaos, destruction and defeat happens. The Martians make their way towards London and cause a stream of refugees to vacant London in chaos where concern for fellow humans begins to deteriorate into every man for himself. It reminded me of Suite Francois which depicts the refugees fleeing Paris from the Nazis. I guess that is a fairly common happening in war time. There is a main character who kind of chronicles all of it and describes the activities of the Martians at work. As he works his way towards London to find his wife and family he learns that the Martians are dying . It seems that they have no immune system and simple viral organisms are the death of them.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
The Brief Wonderous Life of Oscar Wao ****
2007 335 pages
By Junot Diaz
Published by Riverhead Books / Penguin Books
This is a book by a Latin American author (Dominican), and it is typical of most books made by Latino authors - NOT! Guys like Luis Borges, Carlos Fuentes and Juan Rulfo do not start their books with a quote from Stan Lee's of Marvel Comics the Fantastic Four. No they Don't! So this is a completely different species were talking about.
Yet the book was gripping all the way through. It had pop culture, (more on that later), poetry, drama, history and it had lots of humor. All of it interweaves in a seamless manner, moving from the urbane to the profound with out skipping a beat.
So Oscar Wao is a Dominican living in New Jersey in the inner city. He's a complete nerd. He's very smart, but he's fat and does not fit in. He does all the nerdy stuff. Reads comic books (hence the quote from the Fantastic Four), plays at role playing games and attempts to write some of his own fantasy stories. He's not your typical Dominican, especially since he has no luck with the ladies (you see all Dominican men are lady killers.) It wouldn't be so bad if he didn't care that much about the ladies, but he is obsessed with them. Of course their affections are not returned. A few break his heart by entering into the friends zone with him, which drives him even more batty.
Funny enough, less than half the book actually deals with him. In the middle two thirds, the book is about his family and ancestors and their times in the Dominican Republic. It delves into detail about Trujillo's reign of terror. Tragic things happen to his family and ancestors. This is all part of the Fuku (The New World Curse) which his family seems to be saddled with. This is all set up for the beautiful and intensely tragic ending that befalls Oscar (no spoiler here - remember the title is a "Brief Wonderous Life...)
The book has these very interesting footnotes, which are asides from the main story and give lots of history about The Dominican Republic and Trujillo. Interestingly enough, these same footnotes also give background information on the characters, who are of course fictional. It makes the characters seem real while at the same time, adding to the narrative. The footnotes are nice, because they give vital information about the history without disrupting the flow of the story. These footnotes are very curious indeed. They are part of what makes this book so fascinating.
And then there are all the pop culture references due to Oscar's interest in these things. The thing is the culture is not mainstream culture, but references to hipper, cooler geekdom. I related to some of these references, because I was and still am interested in these things. Oscar's interests are comic book authors, Daniel Clowes and the Hernandez Brothers. The author himself quotes Marvel Comics' character The Watcher for his more cerebral and ominous moments. The kids, Oscar and his sister Lola, grow up in the eighties so there are lots of music references. They mention Siouxie and the Banshees and Joy Division.
The language may be an issue for some people. It certainly was for some people in our group. The characters live in the inner city and the main narrator is one of the characters in the story (instead of the typical god-like, faceless narrator) so he uses some raw language.
I very rarely rate a book 4 stars, but this story is so fresh and so well told, and so powerful. It's the first thing I've rated this way for probably over a year.
By Junot Diaz
Published by Riverhead Books / Penguin Books
This is a book by a Latin American author (Dominican), and it is typical of most books made by Latino authors - NOT! Guys like Luis Borges, Carlos Fuentes and Juan Rulfo do not start their books with a quote from Stan Lee's of Marvel Comics the Fantastic Four. No they Don't! So this is a completely different species were talking about.
Yet the book was gripping all the way through. It had pop culture, (more on that later), poetry, drama, history and it had lots of humor. All of it interweaves in a seamless manner, moving from the urbane to the profound with out skipping a beat.
So Oscar Wao is a Dominican living in New Jersey in the inner city. He's a complete nerd. He's very smart, but he's fat and does not fit in. He does all the nerdy stuff. Reads comic books (hence the quote from the Fantastic Four), plays at role playing games and attempts to write some of his own fantasy stories. He's not your typical Dominican, especially since he has no luck with the ladies (you see all Dominican men are lady killers.) It wouldn't be so bad if he didn't care that much about the ladies, but he is obsessed with them. Of course their affections are not returned. A few break his heart by entering into the friends zone with him, which drives him even more batty.
Funny enough, less than half the book actually deals with him. In the middle two thirds, the book is about his family and ancestors and their times in the Dominican Republic. It delves into detail about Trujillo's reign of terror. Tragic things happen to his family and ancestors. This is all part of the Fuku (The New World Curse) which his family seems to be saddled with. This is all set up for the beautiful and intensely tragic ending that befalls Oscar (no spoiler here - remember the title is a "Brief Wonderous Life...)
The book has these very interesting footnotes, which are asides from the main story and give lots of history about The Dominican Republic and Trujillo. Interestingly enough, these same footnotes also give background information on the characters, who are of course fictional. It makes the characters seem real while at the same time, adding to the narrative. The footnotes are nice, because they give vital information about the history without disrupting the flow of the story. These footnotes are very curious indeed. They are part of what makes this book so fascinating.
And then there are all the pop culture references due to Oscar's interest in these things. The thing is the culture is not mainstream culture, but references to hipper, cooler geekdom. I related to some of these references, because I was and still am interested in these things. Oscar's interests are comic book authors, Daniel Clowes and the Hernandez Brothers. The author himself quotes Marvel Comics' character The Watcher for his more cerebral and ominous moments. The kids, Oscar and his sister Lola, grow up in the eighties so there are lots of music references. They mention Siouxie and the Banshees and Joy Division.
The language may be an issue for some people. It certainly was for some people in our group. The characters live in the inner city and the main narrator is one of the characters in the story (instead of the typical god-like, faceless narrator) so he uses some raw language.
I very rarely rate a book 4 stars, but this story is so fresh and so well told, and so powerful. It's the first thing I've rated this way for probably over a year.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
The Duchess **1/2
Directed by Saul Dibb
Adapted from biography by Amanda Foreman
With Kiera Knightly, Ralph Fiennes, Hayley Atwell, Dominic Cooper, Charlotte Rampling, and Simon McBurney
Made in 2008 / seen in theater
OK, I kind of like these king and queen films. Not so much for the romance, which is always a large part of the films, but because I am a sucker for Historical Fiction and epics. Though the romance isn't so bad if the actress is a looker, like in this one. I'm a huge fan of Kiera Knightly. I first saw her in Atonement. That scene in the fountain was memorable. sigh....... But I digress.
This film, according to my poor memory, presented little of what was happening in the outside world when the film was supposed to take place. In fact I can't even place when this film takes place as there were little or no time markers. I wanted to see what is happening off screen. I wanted to see the Spanish Armada, the influence of the new world and the decapitation of Queen Mary of the Scots, like in the recent Queen Ann films. None of that in this film.
It tended to be a soapy thing. True it was beautifully acted and it had lush settings and photography. And of course the beautiful Kiera Knightly (have I said how much I admire her yet?) The film has received many good reviews. I thought it was simply a nice film.
It is supposed to parallel the life of Princess Diane. The Duchess, Georgiana, is married to a cold duke who is only interested in a heir. At first I thought that he was perhaps gay for he never showed any interest in her at all. But no, he continued to have many affairs with other women and he barely made an effort to hide these affairs. Now, I could understand how a man could get tired of a woman, but her husband NEVER showed the slightest interest in her except for the sole reason to produce an heir. It was unfathomable to think that any man would have no physical interest in this beautiful woman who was his wife (have I mentioned how beautiful she is) At least in the beginning, you would think he would be interested in some frolicking around even if her wasn't interested in her intellectually. So it goes with out saying that I had trouble suspending belief on that subject. I might have been biased though.
Was Princess Diana's marriage this horrid? Because truly, Georgiana's husband was horrid to her. In fact, there might be a few scenes in the film where the male audience might feel a little squirmy from the male bashing (by means of his behavior - not what is said about him) that takes place.
I do like that the romance of the film was of the darker variety. The themes of the film were morality, misogyny, sexism and aristocratic power. In that respect, it was less of a romance film than most of these ilk.
Adapted from biography by Amanda Foreman
With Kiera Knightly, Ralph Fiennes, Hayley Atwell, Dominic Cooper, Charlotte Rampling, and Simon McBurney
Made in 2008 / seen in theater
OK, I kind of like these king and queen films. Not so much for the romance, which is always a large part of the films, but because I am a sucker for Historical Fiction and epics. Though the romance isn't so bad if the actress is a looker, like in this one. I'm a huge fan of Kiera Knightly. I first saw her in Atonement. That scene in the fountain was memorable. sigh....... But I digress.
This film, according to my poor memory, presented little of what was happening in the outside world when the film was supposed to take place. In fact I can't even place when this film takes place as there were little or no time markers. I wanted to see what is happening off screen. I wanted to see the Spanish Armada, the influence of the new world and the decapitation of Queen Mary of the Scots, like in the recent Queen Ann films. None of that in this film.
It tended to be a soapy thing. True it was beautifully acted and it had lush settings and photography. And of course the beautiful Kiera Knightly (have I said how much I admire her yet?) The film has received many good reviews. I thought it was simply a nice film.
It is supposed to parallel the life of Princess Diane. The Duchess, Georgiana, is married to a cold duke who is only interested in a heir. At first I thought that he was perhaps gay for he never showed any interest in her at all. But no, he continued to have many affairs with other women and he barely made an effort to hide these affairs. Now, I could understand how a man could get tired of a woman, but her husband NEVER showed the slightest interest in her except for the sole reason to produce an heir. It was unfathomable to think that any man would have no physical interest in this beautiful woman who was his wife (have I mentioned how beautiful she is) At least in the beginning, you would think he would be interested in some frolicking around even if her wasn't interested in her intellectually. So it goes with out saying that I had trouble suspending belief on that subject. I might have been biased though.
Was Princess Diana's marriage this horrid? Because truly, Georgiana's husband was horrid to her. In fact, there might be a few scenes in the film where the male audience might feel a little squirmy from the male bashing (by means of his behavior - not what is said about him) that takes place.
I do like that the romance of the film was of the darker variety. The themes of the film were morality, misogyny, sexism and aristocratic power. In that respect, it was less of a romance film than most of these ilk.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Three Day Road ***
By Joseph Boyden
Published by Penguin Books,
1st Published by Viking Penguin
2005
OK - I knew I would get behind but sheesh! I have at least 5 blogs to do, counting this one, and I continue to read so more blogs will be necessary. Until then, I think I need to take a break from films until I catch up. I can't take a break from reading since I have a lot of obligatory reading to do - plus I wouldn't want to anyway. So these will be short and sweet.
Three Day Road is an antiwar book about pair of Native American friends that go to the Western Front in WWI and hale from a tribe in western Canada.
It's a coming of age story since the two young men start out naive and end up grown up at the end of the book - ravaged and scarred, but grown up. They end up being snipers for their group which gives them some perks the ordinary soldiers don't have, yet they still encounter plenty of horrific incidents. In fact they, especially the Elijah, commit some atrocities themselves. Which is all well and good since this is war, and this behavior is expected to a certain degree, at least against enemy soldiers. But Elijah takes it too far and starts to enjoy the killings while at the same time becoming addicted to Codeine (medicine). He starts to lose his sanity and humanity.
His partner, who is the narrator and never really receives a name but his Christian name is Xavair and his great aunt simply calls him nephew, also has his sanity tested. And though it is clear that Elijah has lost it, there is a more subtle question about the narrator's sanity.
Meanwhile, there is a subplot going on with the great aunt of the narrator. She is an outcast from her tribe and also has magical powers. (Ever notice that the witches and magical people in many stories are always cast out from the villages and live alone in the woods - this character is no exception.) Her role as a priestess (for lack of better word) is to kill the demon that possesses her tribe members and consequently the person carrying the demon. People get the demon by committing cannibalism. And here is the link to the main narrative. Elijah is committing cannibalism either literally (he comes back from a kill with blood smeared over his face) or metaphorically.
An interesting theme is the idea of justice in this book. Does the great aunt have the right to kill these people? In most cases the cannibalism was committed out of desperation. For instance one woman was stuck out in the woods with her husband and her baby. The husband tried to provide sustenance, but could not find any. He ended up freezing to death. He also ended up providing that sustenance since the wife and the baby ended up eating him. Of course these people were killed when they came back from the tribe. The great aunt's father, who did the killing and passed on his powers to his daughter, was arrested for murder by the white civilization.
My first instinct is to say, well, you can't murder, no matter the cause. These people are not necessarily bad because they committed a desperate act. The wife did not murder her husband. Perhaps they could hold on to their sanity in spite of the harrowing conditions given the chance, but the tribe never gives them a chance. They are killed. And sure, the victim goes nutty when they return to their village, but wouldn't most people lose it too if they knew they were about to be killed. The same questions has to be asked about the soldiers when they come back - in the past or even today. After being so severely mentally scarred, they do get a chance for rehabilitation. Some make it, some don't. What would be the future of the survivors when they come back - a question for me that looms large in the book.
The author clearly knows his stuff and demonstrates it with scene after scene of harrowing war action. Gripping at first, but then perhaps a little too much. Some might say, and did in my book discussion group, that they got the point. Of course we as readers can say enough already, but a soldier can't and maybe that's the point.
Over all a very good book.
Published by Penguin Books,
1st Published by Viking Penguin
2005
OK - I knew I would get behind but sheesh! I have at least 5 blogs to do, counting this one, and I continue to read so more blogs will be necessary. Until then, I think I need to take a break from films until I catch up. I can't take a break from reading since I have a lot of obligatory reading to do - plus I wouldn't want to anyway. So these will be short and sweet.
Three Day Road is an antiwar book about pair of Native American friends that go to the Western Front in WWI and hale from a tribe in western Canada.
It's a coming of age story since the two young men start out naive and end up grown up at the end of the book - ravaged and scarred, but grown up. They end up being snipers for their group which gives them some perks the ordinary soldiers don't have, yet they still encounter plenty of horrific incidents. In fact they, especially the Elijah, commit some atrocities themselves. Which is all well and good since this is war, and this behavior is expected to a certain degree, at least against enemy soldiers. But Elijah takes it too far and starts to enjoy the killings while at the same time becoming addicted to Codeine (medicine). He starts to lose his sanity and humanity.
His partner, who is the narrator and never really receives a name but his Christian name is Xavair and his great aunt simply calls him nephew, also has his sanity tested. And though it is clear that Elijah has lost it, there is a more subtle question about the narrator's sanity.
Meanwhile, there is a subplot going on with the great aunt of the narrator. She is an outcast from her tribe and also has magical powers. (Ever notice that the witches and magical people in many stories are always cast out from the villages and live alone in the woods - this character is no exception.) Her role as a priestess (for lack of better word) is to kill the demon that possesses her tribe members and consequently the person carrying the demon. People get the demon by committing cannibalism. And here is the link to the main narrative. Elijah is committing cannibalism either literally (he comes back from a kill with blood smeared over his face) or metaphorically.
An interesting theme is the idea of justice in this book. Does the great aunt have the right to kill these people? In most cases the cannibalism was committed out of desperation. For instance one woman was stuck out in the woods with her husband and her baby. The husband tried to provide sustenance, but could not find any. He ended up freezing to death. He also ended up providing that sustenance since the wife and the baby ended up eating him. Of course these people were killed when they came back from the tribe. The great aunt's father, who did the killing and passed on his powers to his daughter, was arrested for murder by the white civilization.
My first instinct is to say, well, you can't murder, no matter the cause. These people are not necessarily bad because they committed a desperate act. The wife did not murder her husband. Perhaps they could hold on to their sanity in spite of the harrowing conditions given the chance, but the tribe never gives them a chance. They are killed. And sure, the victim goes nutty when they return to their village, but wouldn't most people lose it too if they knew they were about to be killed. The same questions has to be asked about the soldiers when they come back - in the past or even today. After being so severely mentally scarred, they do get a chance for rehabilitation. Some make it, some don't. What would be the future of the survivors when they come back - a question for me that looms large in the book.
The author clearly knows his stuff and demonstrates it with scene after scene of harrowing war action. Gripping at first, but then perhaps a little too much. Some might say, and did in my book discussion group, that they got the point. Of course we as readers can say enough already, but a soldier can't and maybe that's the point.
Over all a very good book.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
The Book Seller of Kabul
**1/2
by Asne Sierstad
I am very remiss in my writing as was expected considering the magnitude of events taking shape in my life now. I read this book back in September, so my memory will be poorer.
The author is attempting to tell this non-fiction tale in a narrative style. As such, she makes assumptions about what the people actually are feeling and thinking. Sometimes, perhaps, she goes a little too far.
The main subject of the book is an ambivilent character. Being a book seller he thinks of himself as a progressive thinker and an instrument in the mission to restore Afghanistan culture to its former glory.
Yet he has the role of the typical patriarch in Muslim society. He takes a second wife to the disgruntlement of his 1st wife, and his daughters are considered important only for their worth in what they bring to the family for their marraiges. One daughter is treated so bad, she is practically a slave to the rest of the family. Even the son can't go to school because he is expected to work in the book shop. An educated man, one would think, would want his children, or at least his sons, to get a good education. He rules the household with an iron fist. Understand that this is no different from most Afghani men, but he claims to be a progressive thinker.
This is a translation from, I believe Swedish, and some of the language seems a little awkward at times. Some of the parts do also drag on a little. I believe a scene where the women are preparing for a wedding is an example of that.
The author does go a little bit into the history of the Russian invasion and the arrival of the Taliban. It certainly added to my knowledge about that issue.
For the most part it was an ejoyable and enlightening book.
by Asne Sierstad
I am very remiss in my writing as was expected considering the magnitude of events taking shape in my life now. I read this book back in September, so my memory will be poorer.
The author is attempting to tell this non-fiction tale in a narrative style. As such, she makes assumptions about what the people actually are feeling and thinking. Sometimes, perhaps, she goes a little too far.
The main subject of the book is an ambivilent character. Being a book seller he thinks of himself as a progressive thinker and an instrument in the mission to restore Afghanistan culture to its former glory.
Yet he has the role of the typical patriarch in Muslim society. He takes a second wife to the disgruntlement of his 1st wife, and his daughters are considered important only for their worth in what they bring to the family for their marraiges. One daughter is treated so bad, she is practically a slave to the rest of the family. Even the son can't go to school because he is expected to work in the book shop. An educated man, one would think, would want his children, or at least his sons, to get a good education. He rules the household with an iron fist. Understand that this is no different from most Afghani men, but he claims to be a progressive thinker.
This is a translation from, I believe Swedish, and some of the language seems a little awkward at times. Some of the parts do also drag on a little. I believe a scene where the women are preparing for a wedding is an example of that.
The author does go a little bit into the history of the Russian invasion and the arrival of the Taliban. It certainly added to my knowledge about that issue.
For the most part it was an ejoyable and enlightening book.
Monday, September 1, 2008
In Bruges **1/2
2008 Seen on DVD (107 mins)
Written and Directed by Martin McDonagh
With Colin Farrell, Ralph Fiennes, Brendan Gleeson, Clemency Poesy
This film made in Belgium is about two assassins, Ray (Farrell) and Ken (Gleeson), who are on the run after a botched job. They are sent to Bruges to lie low for a while. They are a sort of odd couple in that Ken is older and experienced and Ray is impulsive and almost childlike. Ken wants to see the sights of the town, an old medieval town with lots of period architecture, and Ray is bored and uninterested in it and just wants to get out. The shots of the town, by the way are simply beautiful. It looks like a painting.
As the plot moves on, the audience learns that an accident is the reason that the job was botched and Ray is the one who caused it. He is a wreck of a man because he feels something for the victim, something an assassin is not supposed to feel, even if the victim was an innocent bystander. It soon becomes clear that they are sent to Bruges not to lie low, but because the boss, Harry (Fiennes) wants to get rid of Ray - Nothing personal. And that's all I'll write about the plot because I probably already spoiled a bit of it.
There has been a lot of acclaim for Farrells' acting and I would agree, but there is something odd about his character. Maybe that oddness is waht people liked about his portrayal. Ray is of course a young, loudmouth gangster who has no interest in the beautiful and idyllic Bruges. But he's also nervous and neurotic - almost childlike. He has nervous giggles, and he puts his hand to the mouth as if he were biting his nails. It makes me wonder if he's that way because of the tragedy or because his character is that way anyway. It also shows contrast to his older more subdued partner Ken, who eventually takes a kind of fatherly role toward him and sees hope and a future for Ray.
Overall, this is a funny amusing film, with lots of nice views of Bruges. It's dark and has a bloody ending. Some people say that it is too dark, but for me, an old punk rocker, I have no problem with the darkness. I even embrace it.
Written and Directed by Martin McDonagh
With Colin Farrell, Ralph Fiennes, Brendan Gleeson, Clemency Poesy
This film made in Belgium is about two assassins, Ray (Farrell) and Ken (Gleeson), who are on the run after a botched job. They are sent to Bruges to lie low for a while. They are a sort of odd couple in that Ken is older and experienced and Ray is impulsive and almost childlike. Ken wants to see the sights of the town, an old medieval town with lots of period architecture, and Ray is bored and uninterested in it and just wants to get out. The shots of the town, by the way are simply beautiful. It looks like a painting.
As the plot moves on, the audience learns that an accident is the reason that the job was botched and Ray is the one who caused it. He is a wreck of a man because he feels something for the victim, something an assassin is not supposed to feel, even if the victim was an innocent bystander. It soon becomes clear that they are sent to Bruges not to lie low, but because the boss, Harry (Fiennes) wants to get rid of Ray - Nothing personal. And that's all I'll write about the plot because I probably already spoiled a bit of it.
There has been a lot of acclaim for Farrells' acting and I would agree, but there is something odd about his character. Maybe that oddness is waht people liked about his portrayal. Ray is of course a young, loudmouth gangster who has no interest in the beautiful and idyllic Bruges. But he's also nervous and neurotic - almost childlike. He has nervous giggles, and he puts his hand to the mouth as if he were biting his nails. It makes me wonder if he's that way because of the tragedy or because his character is that way anyway. It also shows contrast to his older more subdued partner Ken, who eventually takes a kind of fatherly role toward him and sees hope and a future for Ray.
Overall, this is a funny amusing film, with lots of nice views of Bruges. It's dark and has a bloody ending. Some people say that it is too dark, but for me, an old punk rocker, I have no problem with the darkness. I even embrace it.
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Frozen River ***
2008 - Seen in Theater
Written and directed by Courtney Hunt
With Melissa Leo, Misty Upham, Charlei McDermott, Michael O'Keefe and Mark Boone Jr.
The working poor - When your American dream is simply to own a larger double wide trailer home to replace your smaller beat-up trailer home. This dream is the driving force of the narrative. This film is about a single working poor mother and her desperate attempts to scratch out a living. She resorts to some questionable moral activities to make that living. She recruits the help of a young Native American woman with a sordid past and experience to smuggle illegal immigrants into the country. To do this smuggling, they must drive across the frozen St Lawrence River, with the danger of falling through the ice always imminent.
One interesting aspect of the film is the people who they are smuggling across. Ray, the lead character of the film, discovers that the people who she is smuggling are indebted to the smugglers, who appear to be Russain mafia, who pay for their passage. It's not clear what will happen, but it certainly can be assumed that they will be serving their debts in some way Ray and her companion don't want to consider. One group is a group of young Asian women, who will certainly be used as sex slaves. But Ray and her partner are only concerned with their own small part in all this and generally don't worry about what will happen, though you can see by their expressions that it feels a little unsavory to them.
Ray is a woman who the audience roots for, but as described above, her moral compass is not always set on the straight and narrow. Her prejudice shows when she tries to smuggle across a Pakistan couple and she throws their bag out thinking that it is a terrorist bomb. It ends up being the couple's baby. She is a protagonist who is human.
The movie is bleak, but I find a glimmer of hope. While Ray does go to jail, other characters are taught a lesson and with the money she earns she gets her trailer. She has forged some friendships and has constructed a small family of outcasts which will provide for a slightly rosier future.
Written and directed by Courtney Hunt
With Melissa Leo, Misty Upham, Charlei McDermott, Michael O'Keefe and Mark Boone Jr.
The working poor - When your American dream is simply to own a larger double wide trailer home to replace your smaller beat-up trailer home. This dream is the driving force of the narrative. This film is about a single working poor mother and her desperate attempts to scratch out a living. She resorts to some questionable moral activities to make that living. She recruits the help of a young Native American woman with a sordid past and experience to smuggle illegal immigrants into the country. To do this smuggling, they must drive across the frozen St Lawrence River, with the danger of falling through the ice always imminent.
One interesting aspect of the film is the people who they are smuggling across. Ray, the lead character of the film, discovers that the people who she is smuggling are indebted to the smugglers, who appear to be Russain mafia, who pay for their passage. It's not clear what will happen, but it certainly can be assumed that they will be serving their debts in some way Ray and her companion don't want to consider. One group is a group of young Asian women, who will certainly be used as sex slaves. But Ray and her partner are only concerned with their own small part in all this and generally don't worry about what will happen, though you can see by their expressions that it feels a little unsavory to them.
Ray is a woman who the audience roots for, but as described above, her moral compass is not always set on the straight and narrow. Her prejudice shows when she tries to smuggle across a Pakistan couple and she throws their bag out thinking that it is a terrorist bomb. It ends up being the couple's baby. She is a protagonist who is human.
The movie is bleak, but I find a glimmer of hope. While Ray does go to jail, other characters are taught a lesson and with the money she earns she gets her trailer. She has forged some friendships and has constructed a small family of outcasts which will provide for a slightly rosier future.
Monday, August 25, 2008
Cahokia - City of the Sun **
Written by Claudia Gellman Mink
Published by Cahokia Mounds Museum Society - 1992
76 pages
Some things are what they are. This is a book usually sold by a museum. It's got your basic information. At least it is not a difficult read (though for my students it would be difficult), though it is pretty boring. It gives you the facts and that's that! There is very little anecdotes about the people's daily lives. It describes how life might have been but there are no "tales" here to hold the readers' interest.
It would be difficult for me to use in my class, which is the purpose of my reading this book. I could use some of the simpler excerpts perhaps, but the kids would be bored to death.
Ancient civilizations probably present a special problem to historians and archaeologists. There usually is no or little written record. And coupled with the fact that these civilizations were of course existing a long time ago, it is very difficult to get information about them. So that is one reason that it would be very difficult to write anecdotes and narratives. I believe in this book, the author and archaeologists don't even know the names of the kings. Still, I've seen it done where vivid pictures have been painted of what life might have been like. I remember once I read a book about the Aztecs. The 1st third was incomprehensible, but it got much better when it started to describe what daily life might have been like.
Here is a summary of those basic facts.
There were groups of indigenous peoples in the North American continent called The Mississippians. They started out living in the Southeastern woodlands of North America which is called The American Bottom. Basically it centered abound the confluence of Ohio, Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. Prior to the rise of Cahokia (the civilization being discussed here) mounds were being built. There is one famous one called the serpent mound that is shaped like a serpent, which is located in Ohio.
The Mississippians reached their apex with the city of Cahokia, which is located just east of the Mississippi River and current day St. Louis. It was larger than any city in Europe or the United States up until the year 1800. They built great giant mounds which were probably used for religious and communal purposes.
One reason they were able to become large was due to the cultivation of corn. It was the major food staple of their diet. Some historians hypothesize that the lack of a varied diet helped lead to the downfall of their civilization, along with other problems that can arise from big cites such as health, pollution, overpopulation and the depletion of their resources. Being located in the woodlands, wood of course was a major resource which they used for building structures.
They were a center of trade as proven by the seashells that were found which came from the Gulf of Mexico. The used the rivers as highways to travel and trade.
No one really knows what happened to them. it was probably a combination of things that led to their demise. The problems of big cities mentioned above were certainly a contributing factor. They could have also been conquered by neighboring hostile groups. Archaeologists have found proof of a wooden wall that went around the entire city, probably for protecting themselves, but also possibly to keep the social hierarchy of their society from breaking down - Perhaps it kept the riffraff out. And there is no evidence of any great battle.
The city lasted until the early 1400's when it was abandoned. It was too early for European explorers and conquerors to meet them, but they did meet some of their ancestors who told them tales of this great civilization.
I think if I teach this as a unit of study, I'll probably just stick to the information I just summarized. There are lots of ancient objects found, but that would be too subtle for my students to enjoy.
Published by Cahokia Mounds Museum Society - 1992
76 pages
Some things are what they are. This is a book usually sold by a museum. It's got your basic information. At least it is not a difficult read (though for my students it would be difficult), though it is pretty boring. It gives you the facts and that's that! There is very little anecdotes about the people's daily lives. It describes how life might have been but there are no "tales" here to hold the readers' interest.
It would be difficult for me to use in my class, which is the purpose of my reading this book. I could use some of the simpler excerpts perhaps, but the kids would be bored to death.
Ancient civilizations probably present a special problem to historians and archaeologists. There usually is no or little written record. And coupled with the fact that these civilizations were of course existing a long time ago, it is very difficult to get information about them. So that is one reason that it would be very difficult to write anecdotes and narratives. I believe in this book, the author and archaeologists don't even know the names of the kings. Still, I've seen it done where vivid pictures have been painted of what life might have been like. I remember once I read a book about the Aztecs. The 1st third was incomprehensible, but it got much better when it started to describe what daily life might have been like.
Here is a summary of those basic facts.
There were groups of indigenous peoples in the North American continent called The Mississippians. They started out living in the Southeastern woodlands of North America which is called The American Bottom. Basically it centered abound the confluence of Ohio, Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. Prior to the rise of Cahokia (the civilization being discussed here) mounds were being built. There is one famous one called the serpent mound that is shaped like a serpent, which is located in Ohio.
The Mississippians reached their apex with the city of Cahokia, which is located just east of the Mississippi River and current day St. Louis. It was larger than any city in Europe or the United States up until the year 1800. They built great giant mounds which were probably used for religious and communal purposes.
One reason they were able to become large was due to the cultivation of corn. It was the major food staple of their diet. Some historians hypothesize that the lack of a varied diet helped lead to the downfall of their civilization, along with other problems that can arise from big cites such as health, pollution, overpopulation and the depletion of their resources. Being located in the woodlands, wood of course was a major resource which they used for building structures.
They were a center of trade as proven by the seashells that were found which came from the Gulf of Mexico. The used the rivers as highways to travel and trade.
No one really knows what happened to them. it was probably a combination of things that led to their demise. The problems of big cities mentioned above were certainly a contributing factor. They could have also been conquered by neighboring hostile groups. Archaeologists have found proof of a wooden wall that went around the entire city, probably for protecting themselves, but also possibly to keep the social hierarchy of their society from breaking down - Perhaps it kept the riffraff out. And there is no evidence of any great battle.
The city lasted until the early 1400's when it was abandoned. It was too early for European explorers and conquerors to meet them, but they did meet some of their ancestors who told them tales of this great civilization.
I think if I teach this as a unit of study, I'll probably just stick to the information I just summarized. There are lots of ancient objects found, but that would be too subtle for my students to enjoy.
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Longitude - The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of his Time ***
by Dava Sobel
1995 Walker Publishing Company
The title of the book is a little misleading, but it's still a good book. It makes it sound like the inventor invented Longitude. He didn't - he just solved the problem of how to figure out longitude. In fact, he didn't even really figure it out. They already knew how to figure out longitude.
The globe, being circular in shape is divided into 360 degrees of longitude. Every one degree of longitude represents a certain distance (15 or 30 miles for example). The way to figure out how many degrees you traveled is by using the time of where you departed from compared to the time of where a ship is located in that exact moment. So they knew how to do it! The problem was that they needed to keep the departure time current and accurate so the comparison could be calculated accurately. Well 300 years ago, time keepers (watches) were not able to withstand the trials of sea travel - the extreme heat and cold, the movement of the boat and the constant wet conditions. So really, this book is the story of how this inventor created a watch that was extremely accurate an durable. He was an innovator of clock mechanics - not the inventor of longitude.
Of course his accurate clocks enabled sailors to calculate Longitude, so he did solve the problem of longitude.
An interesting theme in the book is that this longitude problem was rife with politics. The longitude problem was so important (and deemed almost impossible to solve at the time) that the King of England offered an award for the person who could solve this problem. Well, many people tried and what it amounted to was that there were two different strains of logic. The king had set up a board to help solve the problem and judge the solutions that came in. The memebers of the board were of course all scientists and mathematicians, and they were not eager to endorse a mechanical solution by a mere clockmaker. They were more interested in astronomical and scientific ways to figure it out. There was much resistance to the time pieces and therefore, it took the clockmaker over 20 years to convince this board that his time keepers were the solution.
There are some other minor points that are interesting, such as how they picked the Prime Meridian, but the above summary, pretty much gets to the gist of the story.
The book is easy to read (relatively - some of the older women in the Chicago Pubic Library were not able to get through it) and tells some good anecdotes and tales.
1995 Walker Publishing Company
The title of the book is a little misleading, but it's still a good book. It makes it sound like the inventor invented Longitude. He didn't - he just solved the problem of how to figure out longitude. In fact, he didn't even really figure it out. They already knew how to figure out longitude.
The globe, being circular in shape is divided into 360 degrees of longitude. Every one degree of longitude represents a certain distance (15 or 30 miles for example). The way to figure out how many degrees you traveled is by using the time of where you departed from compared to the time of where a ship is located in that exact moment. So they knew how to do it! The problem was that they needed to keep the departure time current and accurate so the comparison could be calculated accurately. Well 300 years ago, time keepers (watches) were not able to withstand the trials of sea travel - the extreme heat and cold, the movement of the boat and the constant wet conditions. So really, this book is the story of how this inventor created a watch that was extremely accurate an durable. He was an innovator of clock mechanics - not the inventor of longitude.
Of course his accurate clocks enabled sailors to calculate Longitude, so he did solve the problem of longitude.
An interesting theme in the book is that this longitude problem was rife with politics. The longitude problem was so important (and deemed almost impossible to solve at the time) that the King of England offered an award for the person who could solve this problem. Well, many people tried and what it amounted to was that there were two different strains of logic. The king had set up a board to help solve the problem and judge the solutions that came in. The memebers of the board were of course all scientists and mathematicians, and they were not eager to endorse a mechanical solution by a mere clockmaker. They were more interested in astronomical and scientific ways to figure it out. There was much resistance to the time pieces and therefore, it took the clockmaker over 20 years to convince this board that his time keepers were the solution.
There are some other minor points that are interesting, such as how they picked the Prime Meridian, but the above summary, pretty much gets to the gist of the story.
The book is easy to read (relatively - some of the older women in the Chicago Pubic Library were not able to get through it) and tells some good anecdotes and tales.
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Baghead **1/2
2008
Directors/Writers Mark and Jay Duplass
With: Ross Partridge, Steve Zissis, Greta Gerwig and Elise Muller
Seen in theater
So the premise of the movie is that 4 underemployed actors are inspired by a low tech DIY art-house film that they had saw at a film festival. Convinced that they could do much better, they decide that instead of waiting to be cast in a movie that they instead would write and star in their own low budget vehicle.
This cracks me up, because clearly, Baghead is a low budget film identifiably so with its use of digital video cameras and easily accessed settings. It makes me wonder if this film itself was created under the same circumstances with the same goals and objectives.
There are some issues with the characters because no one is quite sure who want to be with whom romantically. Meanwhile, they decide that they would write this film at a vacation cabin in the woods. They go to the cabin and personalities, liquor and perhaps the lack of ambition get in the way of them writing the movie. One of the women has several apparitions in which she sees a man with a bag over his head that seems to be stalking her. With the anger and mistrust that many characters have now, it is not certain if it was really an apparition, one of the characters messing with each other or really a psychotic killer. The film keeps the audience guessing through out the whole thing.
So the film works as a comedy and also as a low key horror movie. It's a lot of fun to watch.
Directors/Writers Mark and Jay Duplass
With: Ross Partridge, Steve Zissis, Greta Gerwig and Elise Muller
Seen in theater
So the premise of the movie is that 4 underemployed actors are inspired by a low tech DIY art-house film that they had saw at a film festival. Convinced that they could do much better, they decide that instead of waiting to be cast in a movie that they instead would write and star in their own low budget vehicle.
This cracks me up, because clearly, Baghead is a low budget film identifiably so with its use of digital video cameras and easily accessed settings. It makes me wonder if this film itself was created under the same circumstances with the same goals and objectives.
There are some issues with the characters because no one is quite sure who want to be with whom romantically. Meanwhile, they decide that they would write this film at a vacation cabin in the woods. They go to the cabin and personalities, liquor and perhaps the lack of ambition get in the way of them writing the movie. One of the women has several apparitions in which she sees a man with a bag over his head that seems to be stalking her. With the anger and mistrust that many characters have now, it is not certain if it was really an apparition, one of the characters messing with each other or really a psychotic killer. The film keeps the audience guessing through out the whole thing.
So the film works as a comedy and also as a low key horror movie. It's a lot of fun to watch.
Monday, August 4, 2008
Redacted **
2007
Written and Directed by Brian DePalma
With; Rob Devaney, Izzy Diaz, Patrick Carrol, Ty Jones and Kel O'Neil
Studio; Magnolia
This is a war filmed LOOSELY based on an actual incident in Iraq in which a 15 year old girl was raped and murdered. While watching it, I kind of liked it, but after reading some reviews about it, I saw that reviews were largely mixed and that the majority were negative. Now my main source is The Chicago Reader (See links on this page) and they liked it with reservations. They liked that the film tried to take on a serious and timely subject. I liked it for that reason. I felt it showed both sides of the issue. It showed the Iraqis being abused and hurt and the soldiers' stressful lives that quite often lead to cataclysmic consequences - sometimes accidental and sometimes (as in the case of the rape) not.
So there is a large controversy over this film. Some people say it showed the soldiers in a bad light. But I disagree with that because it did not show all the soldiers in a bad light. Several soldiers tried to stop it and one only relented because a gun was pointed at him by one of the crazy soldiers. Interestingly enough, one soldier was there to video tape it and was therefore an accomplice because he was standing there watching the whole thing. His excuse was that he was there to document it so that the "truth" could come out. This scene represents an interesting and thought provoking idea about the role of the media and their responsibilities. Should media be there as an observer or should media get involved when necessary? This is certainly not a new question, but one that takes on more significance with the war being a current phenomenon.
And then there are the two "monsters". The instigators of the crime. They are portrayed as hideous and unmerciful, but there are enough clues here to show that even they might be victims from the stresses of war. I mean one of them is so crazy that his speech is almost incomprehensible. he also shoots a pregnant woman and her family because their car would not slow down or stop at a checkpoint. The soldier did wait to shoot until the car crossed a certain line. Protocol had been followed, and no one could argue that the soldiers shouldn't protect themselves. Though his attitude about it after wards was racist and disturbing. So the question that comes to mind is was he feeling remorse or was he a monster? The fact that he defended his action, while at the same time slurring the Iraqi people tells me he might have been hiding some guilt under the bravado.
To me, it is also an interesting commentary on American culture. The fact that our culture could allow people like these two thugs to flourish. You know, the macho, kick-ass attitude that men seem to need to have these days or otherwise they will be seen as less than manly. The same culture that makes men take steroids so that they can be bigger and stronger and faster (incidentally, that is a title of a documentary about steroids which came out this year that I strongly recommend). So even these two monsters are shown in a light that is gray and murky. One can not draw draw conclusions about them that are black or white.
The structure of the film is interesting, but many critics did not like it. Maybe I'm too unsophisticated but I liked it. The whole movie was shot from the point of view of different media formats. It was not a straight narrative. A large portion of it was "shot" by a hand held video camera that the soldier had which I previously spoke about. But many different media were also used. Part of the story was told in a faux French documentary with subtitles, in French because the men spoke English of course. There were also news reels and of course the Internet. The criticism was that it was too much and too distracting. But I think that it is directly related to one of the films themes. That the media is implicit in all this and helps drive the events in the war. For instance, in the disturbing scene of the soldier being decapitated, well, that demonstrates the power of the media whether we like it or not.
Some critics also said the acting was awful. Well, again, maybe I'm not too sophisticated and I did not notice it. Now I was not overwhelmed by the acting, but neither did I notice really bad acting. Perhaps they were speaking of the crazy soldier who at times was incomprehensible, but if he was crazy, his incomprehensibility would have been appropriate. Or perhaps maybe some of the actors might have overacted to the horrific events in the film, but there was nothing obvious that I saw.
I did notice the violence before I read any reviews, and DePalma is know for violent films. There's a concept that when artists display violence to show how awful it is, it quite often ends up being just as bad as the real violence it is betraying because it titillates the audience. Sometimes I did think the violence was over the top.
Some critics, many of them your average citizens, thought that this movie should not be shown simply because the soldiers had enough problems and that it would lower moral. I disagree with that completely. The "truth" must be shown (even though remember that this is a fiction). Besides, not everyone in the film were monsters. Some were quite heroic because they were doing what they thought was right under very trying circumstances.
The last criticism against the movie was that it did not have the facts of the case straight. This might be a valid criticism if this was a documentary, but it was a fictional film. DePalma himself said that the lawyers told him that the film had to be different from the real events. It was based on a real event, it was NOT a reenactment of it.
I could not find a trailer, but here is a clip. It's the part where it is supposed to be a French Documentary.
Written and Directed by Brian DePalma
With; Rob Devaney, Izzy Diaz, Patrick Carrol, Ty Jones and Kel O'Neil
Studio; Magnolia
This is a war filmed LOOSELY based on an actual incident in Iraq in which a 15 year old girl was raped and murdered. While watching it, I kind of liked it, but after reading some reviews about it, I saw that reviews were largely mixed and that the majority were negative. Now my main source is The Chicago Reader (See links on this page) and they liked it with reservations. They liked that the film tried to take on a serious and timely subject. I liked it for that reason. I felt it showed both sides of the issue. It showed the Iraqis being abused and hurt and the soldiers' stressful lives that quite often lead to cataclysmic consequences - sometimes accidental and sometimes (as in the case of the rape) not.
So there is a large controversy over this film. Some people say it showed the soldiers in a bad light. But I disagree with that because it did not show all the soldiers in a bad light. Several soldiers tried to stop it and one only relented because a gun was pointed at him by one of the crazy soldiers. Interestingly enough, one soldier was there to video tape it and was therefore an accomplice because he was standing there watching the whole thing. His excuse was that he was there to document it so that the "truth" could come out. This scene represents an interesting and thought provoking idea about the role of the media and their responsibilities. Should media be there as an observer or should media get involved when necessary? This is certainly not a new question, but one that takes on more significance with the war being a current phenomenon.
And then there are the two "monsters". The instigators of the crime. They are portrayed as hideous and unmerciful, but there are enough clues here to show that even they might be victims from the stresses of war. I mean one of them is so crazy that his speech is almost incomprehensible. he also shoots a pregnant woman and her family because their car would not slow down or stop at a checkpoint. The soldier did wait to shoot until the car crossed a certain line. Protocol had been followed, and no one could argue that the soldiers shouldn't protect themselves. Though his attitude about it after wards was racist and disturbing. So the question that comes to mind is was he feeling remorse or was he a monster? The fact that he defended his action, while at the same time slurring the Iraqi people tells me he might have been hiding some guilt under the bravado.
To me, it is also an interesting commentary on American culture. The fact that our culture could allow people like these two thugs to flourish. You know, the macho, kick-ass attitude that men seem to need to have these days or otherwise they will be seen as less than manly. The same culture that makes men take steroids so that they can be bigger and stronger and faster (incidentally, that is a title of a documentary about steroids which came out this year that I strongly recommend). So even these two monsters are shown in a light that is gray and murky. One can not draw draw conclusions about them that are black or white.
The structure of the film is interesting, but many critics did not like it. Maybe I'm too unsophisticated but I liked it. The whole movie was shot from the point of view of different media formats. It was not a straight narrative. A large portion of it was "shot" by a hand held video camera that the soldier had which I previously spoke about. But many different media were also used. Part of the story was told in a faux French documentary with subtitles, in French because the men spoke English of course. There were also news reels and of course the Internet. The criticism was that it was too much and too distracting. But I think that it is directly related to one of the films themes. That the media is implicit in all this and helps drive the events in the war. For instance, in the disturbing scene of the soldier being decapitated, well, that demonstrates the power of the media whether we like it or not.
Some critics also said the acting was awful. Well, again, maybe I'm not too sophisticated and I did not notice it. Now I was not overwhelmed by the acting, but neither did I notice really bad acting. Perhaps they were speaking of the crazy soldier who at times was incomprehensible, but if he was crazy, his incomprehensibility would have been appropriate. Or perhaps maybe some of the actors might have overacted to the horrific events in the film, but there was nothing obvious that I saw.
I did notice the violence before I read any reviews, and DePalma is know for violent films. There's a concept that when artists display violence to show how awful it is, it quite often ends up being just as bad as the real violence it is betraying because it titillates the audience. Sometimes I did think the violence was over the top.
Some critics, many of them your average citizens, thought that this movie should not be shown simply because the soldiers had enough problems and that it would lower moral. I disagree with that completely. The "truth" must be shown (even though remember that this is a fiction). Besides, not everyone in the film were monsters. Some were quite heroic because they were doing what they thought was right under very trying circumstances.
The last criticism against the movie was that it did not have the facts of the case straight. This might be a valid criticism if this was a documentary, but it was a fictional film. DePalma himself said that the lawyers told him that the film had to be different from the real events. It was based on a real event, it was NOT a reenactment of it.
I could not find a trailer, but here is a clip. It's the part where it is supposed to be a French Documentary.
The Brooklyn Follies ***
By Paul Auster
2006
Published by Henry Holt & Company
306 pages
Paul Auster is one of my favorite authors. This book is advertised as his most uplifting book. His other books do have darker subject matter. Not that this book doesn't have dark moments, it most definitely does, but everything turns out OK in the end. Every one is content. Not fabulously rich and famous - but content.
The narrator, Nathan Glass is a 60 year old divorced man, who has been diagnosed with a disease that would kill him in the year. So he moves to his childhood home of Brooklyn and decides to write all the little stories he could think of that happened in his life that, usually, humorously don't turn out quite right - hence Brooklyn FOLLIES. But then life starts to happen to him.
He meets up with his brilliant nephew, Tom, who is not doing as well as hoped and who is down in the dumps working in a used book store. His niece, is a wild and out of control girl who they are constantly worried about and they befriend the owner of the bookstore, Harry, who has a mysterious and shady past. Well Harry has a plan and the narrative takes off from there.
I really enjoyed this book, as I do all Auster's books. His characters are quirky and likable. And like I said previously, the story is pretty positive. I felt myself well up a couple of times, of course I am a sucker for long distance telephone commercials, so my welling up isn't saying much. But ti wasn't sappy. This book came at a good time in my life in which there is a lot of darkness in my life. I have been much more upbeat in the last couple of weeks (though I do have a tendency to enjoy wallowing in my misery). It helped me get to the point where I am ready to continue with my life.
So that last question I need to answer for myself is why is it not a 4 star book - A masterpiece. I am always a little suspicious of literature that is too easy or too light. I am not suggesting that this is a light book, but it is compared to Auster's other work.
2006
Published by Henry Holt & Company
306 pages
Paul Auster is one of my favorite authors. This book is advertised as his most uplifting book. His other books do have darker subject matter. Not that this book doesn't have dark moments, it most definitely does, but everything turns out OK in the end. Every one is content. Not fabulously rich and famous - but content.
The narrator, Nathan Glass is a 60 year old divorced man, who has been diagnosed with a disease that would kill him in the year. So he moves to his childhood home of Brooklyn and decides to write all the little stories he could think of that happened in his life that, usually, humorously don't turn out quite right - hence Brooklyn FOLLIES. But then life starts to happen to him.
He meets up with his brilliant nephew, Tom, who is not doing as well as hoped and who is down in the dumps working in a used book store. His niece, is a wild and out of control girl who they are constantly worried about and they befriend the owner of the bookstore, Harry, who has a mysterious and shady past. Well Harry has a plan and the narrative takes off from there.
I really enjoyed this book, as I do all Auster's books. His characters are quirky and likable. And like I said previously, the story is pretty positive. I felt myself well up a couple of times, of course I am a sucker for long distance telephone commercials, so my welling up isn't saying much. But ti wasn't sappy. This book came at a good time in my life in which there is a lot of darkness in my life. I have been much more upbeat in the last couple of weeks (though I do have a tendency to enjoy wallowing in my misery). It helped me get to the point where I am ready to continue with my life.
So that last question I need to answer for myself is why is it not a 4 star book - A masterpiece. I am always a little suspicious of literature that is too easy or too light. I am not suggesting that this is a light book, but it is compared to Auster's other work.
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Best Cds of 2007
This last year has seen a reduction of the quantity of CDs I have bought. I am starting to realize that no one really has time to listen to all this music. In fact the summer of 2007 was the year of The Great Purge in which I sold 40% - 50% of my music. I wish I could say how many CDs I bought this year (I actually do count and compare from year to year) but its been over 7 months since I made that count. I would guess I bought about 80 CDs, which is down from the usual well over 100 CDs per year. With finances being really tight, I expect the number for next year to be even lower. Right now as of August 2008, I have about 40.
Another thing about this year is that I noticed that some of the CDs I have not listened to very much, which means I really don’t have a great idea of what they are about – A general idea but not a great understanding. So I expect that the ranking of the cds will be very loose, especially for the lower ranking CDs. So without any further ado, here is the best of 2007:
1. Beirut – The Flying Club Cup – This guy just doesn’t miss. In my opinion it’s a slight improvement over the last CD. Has a little more French influence, but the Eastern European is still there.
2. Great Lake Swimmers – Ongiara – While a tad on the softer side, there is some beautiful acoustic folk music here.
3. Grinderman – Grinderman – Nick Cave rocking out. I think that this is better than the Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! CD, though many critics disagree with me.
4. Jessie Sykes & The Sweet Hereafter – Like Love & Lust & The Open Halls of the Soul – A little more rocking than her last CD, yet still lush and haunting.
5. The National – The Boxer – Another Solid effort, though I still prefer Alligator.
6. Stax – 50th Anniversary Celebration – Now I’m not a fan of Rhythm and Blues, but the quality of song writing on this CD is unquestionable. If you don’t know what Stax is, thing Motown but hipper.
7. Iron & Wine – The Shepard’s Dog – I like his more recent work because it is a little more rockier.
8. P.J. Harvey – White Chalk – She plays piano instead of guitar. The results are spooky and beautiful.
9. Spoon – Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga – This one is a bit more minimalist than their others, but still some catchy tunes.
10. Monsieur Gainsbourg Revisited – Various Artists – Some nice renditions of classic songs.
11. Bright Eyes – Cassadaga – No new sound really, but there are some really good songs.
12. Chris & Carla – Fly High Brave Dreamers – I have not been able to get into this CD very much, though they are some of my all time favorite performers. I suspect with more listens, this would go up more in the rankings.
13. Bishop Allen & the Broken String - Bishop Allen & the Broken String – My Space Phenom. They release all their songs on My Space and than compiled their best songs for the CD. Great catchy pop songs.
14. Blanche – Little Amber Bottles – A Bit of a disappointment from their debut CD, but there are still some great songs on here. Maybe with some more listens…
15. Joe Henry – Civilian – A solid CD of Americanaish music. Very good song writing.
16. New Model Army – High – Solid Songs from punk Rock/Activist group
17. Andrew Bird – Armchair Apocrypha – While this one is good, I have not been able to get into this one as much as the previous CD. More listens needed?
18. Earlimart – Mentor – Good solid pop music. Kind of drags in second half .
19. Chuck Prophet – Soap and Water – Americana music but slightly more rockin’ than the typical for the genre.
And the bottom of the pile. Still good but perhaps they need more listens.
20. Cafe tacuba - Sino
21. Josh Ritter - The Historical Conquests of...
22. Bryan Ferry - Dylanesque
23. Pylon - Gyrate (rerelease)
24. Karen Ann - Karen Ann
25. Moby Grape - Listen My Friends (rerelease)
Another thing about this year is that I noticed that some of the CDs I have not listened to very much, which means I really don’t have a great idea of what they are about – A general idea but not a great understanding. So I expect that the ranking of the cds will be very loose, especially for the lower ranking CDs. So without any further ado, here is the best of 2007:
1. Beirut – The Flying Club Cup – This guy just doesn’t miss. In my opinion it’s a slight improvement over the last CD. Has a little more French influence, but the Eastern European is still there.
2. Great Lake Swimmers – Ongiara – While a tad on the softer side, there is some beautiful acoustic folk music here.
3. Grinderman – Grinderman – Nick Cave rocking out. I think that this is better than the Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! CD, though many critics disagree with me.
4. Jessie Sykes & The Sweet Hereafter – Like Love & Lust & The Open Halls of the Soul – A little more rocking than her last CD, yet still lush and haunting.
5. The National – The Boxer – Another Solid effort, though I still prefer Alligator.
6. Stax – 50th Anniversary Celebration – Now I’m not a fan of Rhythm and Blues, but the quality of song writing on this CD is unquestionable. If you don’t know what Stax is, thing Motown but hipper.
7. Iron & Wine – The Shepard’s Dog – I like his more recent work because it is a little more rockier.
8. P.J. Harvey – White Chalk – She plays piano instead of guitar. The results are spooky and beautiful.
9. Spoon – Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga – This one is a bit more minimalist than their others, but still some catchy tunes.
10. Monsieur Gainsbourg Revisited – Various Artists – Some nice renditions of classic songs.
11. Bright Eyes – Cassadaga – No new sound really, but there are some really good songs.
12. Chris & Carla – Fly High Brave Dreamers – I have not been able to get into this CD very much, though they are some of my all time favorite performers. I suspect with more listens, this would go up more in the rankings.
13. Bishop Allen & the Broken String - Bishop Allen & the Broken String – My Space Phenom. They release all their songs on My Space and than compiled their best songs for the CD. Great catchy pop songs.
14. Blanche – Little Amber Bottles – A Bit of a disappointment from their debut CD, but there are still some great songs on here. Maybe with some more listens…
15. Joe Henry – Civilian – A solid CD of Americanaish music. Very good song writing.
16. New Model Army – High – Solid Songs from punk Rock/Activist group
17. Andrew Bird – Armchair Apocrypha – While this one is good, I have not been able to get into this one as much as the previous CD. More listens needed?
18. Earlimart – Mentor – Good solid pop music. Kind of drags in second half .
19. Chuck Prophet – Soap and Water – Americana music but slightly more rockin’ than the typical for the genre.
And the bottom of the pile. Still good but perhaps they need more listens.
20. Cafe tacuba - Sino
21. Josh Ritter - The Historical Conquests of...
22. Bryan Ferry - Dylanesque
23. Pylon - Gyrate (rerelease)
24. Karen Ann - Karen Ann
25. Moby Grape - Listen My Friends (rerelease)
Monday, July 28, 2008
Rendition **1/2
2007
Seen on DVD
Screenwriter - Kelley Sane
Director - Gavin Hood
With: Omar Metwally, Jake Gyllenhaal, Reese Witherspoon,
Peter Sarsgaard, Meryl Streep, Alan Arkin
This is a mostly well done film about rendition. - the practice of the U.S. government to take suspected terrorists to foreign countries because torture is not permitted in this country. There is some fine acting and some fairly big names.
The film has several story lines. There is a CIA agent who has to oversee the torture and of course there is the Egyptian-American who is being tortured. The agent is a bit"green" and is conflicted by what he sees (as well as the viewer, which I liked about this film). The victim is married to Reese Witherspoon's character, which shows how 'American' he is. Reese Witherspoon tries to find out what is happening, since the suspect is not allowed any phone calls. Apparently, the government has some phone records which show that the suspect's cell had been in contact with a known terrorist. At first he denies any knowledge of the phone calls and claims the information is mistaken. Then under duress, he "confesses". The film keeps the viewer wondering for a relatively long time what the truth of the matter is.
There is another subplot about a young man and his girlfriend. The young man is drawn to the radical Jihadist movement by past tragedy in his life. This line of narrative is criticised by the Reader as being unnecessary, though it does serve to tie in most of the characters. I tend to agree with the Reader, but I did like how this subplot messes with the narrative and ends up being sort of a twist which kept me off guard somewhat.
This is a well done political thriller, with nary a complaint against it. There's not much to say about it really.
Seen on DVD
Screenwriter - Kelley Sane
Director - Gavin Hood
With: Omar Metwally, Jake Gyllenhaal, Reese Witherspoon,
Peter Sarsgaard, Meryl Streep, Alan Arkin
This is a mostly well done film about rendition. - the practice of the U.S. government to take suspected terrorists to foreign countries because torture is not permitted in this country. There is some fine acting and some fairly big names.
The film has several story lines. There is a CIA agent who has to oversee the torture and of course there is the Egyptian-American who is being tortured. The agent is a bit"green" and is conflicted by what he sees (as well as the viewer, which I liked about this film). The victim is married to Reese Witherspoon's character, which shows how 'American' he is. Reese Witherspoon tries to find out what is happening, since the suspect is not allowed any phone calls. Apparently, the government has some phone records which show that the suspect's cell had been in contact with a known terrorist. At first he denies any knowledge of the phone calls and claims the information is mistaken. Then under duress, he "confesses". The film keeps the viewer wondering for a relatively long time what the truth of the matter is.
There is another subplot about a young man and his girlfriend. The young man is drawn to the radical Jihadist movement by past tragedy in his life. This line of narrative is criticised by the Reader as being unnecessary, though it does serve to tie in most of the characters. I tend to agree with the Reader, but I did like how this subplot messes with the narrative and ends up being sort of a twist which kept me off guard somewhat.
This is a well done political thriller, with nary a complaint against it. There's not much to say about it really.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
I Saw Her from Here / I Saw Here from Her **1/2
Christian Kjellvander
2007 Startracks
Recorded at Mission Hall Studios in Sebbarp Sweden
Performers:
Christian Kjellvander - Vocals, Guitars, piano, banjo
organs, percussion and mellotron.
Andreas Ejnarsson - Bass, backing vocals, piano synths
Per Nordmark - Drums and Percussion
Goran Kajfes - Trumpets
Tias Carlson - Guitar, banjo, backing vocals
Karla - Therese Kjellvander - Vocals, piano, mandolin
Daniel Frank - Guitars and backing vocals
Dan England - pedal steel
Mr. Kjellvander is the artist who made one of my all time favorite CDs, Songs from a Two Room Chapel. It had a slight Americana sound with some great and emotional vocals and an instinct for putting together a great pop hook. It is a near master piece if not a total master piece. So I have been waiting for more of his work to come from Sweden (his home). His next CD was called Faya and while pretty, it is a little too slow. It's more of a folk album. So finally in 2007 comes this one. I was a little reluctant to buy it because I was disappointed by Faya. My first impression was a relief. Some of his characteristic pop sound had come back as well as continuing the mellower folkier stuff. I thought that this was a step in the right direction. But after a few more listen (I try to preview casually a CD at least three times before sitting down seriously to review it) I realized that there were moments that sounded like an out right attempt to get commercial notoriety. He is better known in Sweden than here in the States, so there may be some pressure on him over there to do so.
Poppies and Peonies ***1/2 - This is typical of what I was expecting from him. It's a nice catchy song. It does start with some electronics similar to some of David Kitt's work. There's a nice guitar solo in the center of the piece. It's about love that can not be. At the end he finds a girl that needs him as well as she needs him and they are together like poppies and peonies (Do those two flowers usually go together?)
When the Mourning Comes *** - This starts with a banjo and is more countryish. So there is just the banjo and his voice. Then a little bass and a female backing vocal comes in. And it continues to build with some acoustic guitar. Overall, nicely put together. The lyrics are just another love song, saying that he'll be there. There is a feeling of travel, perhaps to meet his gal or perhaps they are drifting together. "Empathy and sympathy are sisters, are drifters like we." Also, "We can drive until daylight than I'll rest." This traveling might be some kind of metaphor for their relationship, even though he gets tired, "We can drive until daybreak, than I'll rest". He determined to be with her. It's more imagery than a story. A little horn comes in the latter part of the song which is nice.
Somewhere Else *** - It starts with a little acoustic guitar and his voice. It has a somber feeling to it. There is some sonic distortion that gently floats over the voice and the guitar. It's a very pretty and haunting song. The lyrics are darker too. "Too afraid to make mistakes and bleed". The song ends with a statement about death. "And I'm not afraid to die, the misconception swells, / but when I die won't be the first time I wish that I was somewhere else." Hence the title.
Two Souls **1/2 - This is a much more upbeat song. It's all very nice, but it sounds like an attempt at commercialism. But it's also hard to argue with his great voice and his songwriting. It only really annoys me in one short section at the end of the chorus. There are also some nice horns. In the middle there is a short flurry of guitar flash. They seem to be driving in this song - perhaps I smell a motif? His two souls are opposites. On will love her and the other one will cause her hurt. Perhaps the metaphor is too facile.
Bird Black Sky *** - It has a menacing name and it starts off with a menacing droning sound. The vocal is added and stays slow and steady. Then it picks up a little. A promising start.The chorus is much more upbeat with a some choppy piano playing. The drone continues to float across the whole song. This also mentions love but there is a kind of foreboding. "do you hear the bells ring? / Do you feel the sky blackening?"
2007 Startracks
Recorded at Mission Hall Studios in Sebbarp Sweden
Performers:
Christian Kjellvander - Vocals, Guitars, piano, banjo
organs, percussion and mellotron.
Andreas Ejnarsson - Bass, backing vocals, piano synths
Per Nordmark - Drums and Percussion
Goran Kajfes - Trumpets
Tias Carlson - Guitar, banjo, backing vocals
Karla - Therese Kjellvander - Vocals, piano, mandolin
Daniel Frank - Guitars and backing vocals
Dan England - pedal steel
Mr. Kjellvander is the artist who made one of my all time favorite CDs, Songs from a Two Room Chapel. It had a slight Americana sound with some great and emotional vocals and an instinct for putting together a great pop hook. It is a near master piece if not a total master piece. So I have been waiting for more of his work to come from Sweden (his home). His next CD was called Faya and while pretty, it is a little too slow. It's more of a folk album. So finally in 2007 comes this one. I was a little reluctant to buy it because I was disappointed by Faya. My first impression was a relief. Some of his characteristic pop sound had come back as well as continuing the mellower folkier stuff. I thought that this was a step in the right direction. But after a few more listen (I try to preview casually a CD at least three times before sitting down seriously to review it) I realized that there were moments that sounded like an out right attempt to get commercial notoriety. He is better known in Sweden than here in the States, so there may be some pressure on him over there to do so.
Poppies and Peonies ***1/2 - This is typical of what I was expecting from him. It's a nice catchy song. It does start with some electronics similar to some of David Kitt's work. There's a nice guitar solo in the center of the piece. It's about love that can not be. At the end he finds a girl that needs him as well as she needs him and they are together like poppies and peonies (Do those two flowers usually go together?)
When the Mourning Comes *** - This starts with a banjo and is more countryish. So there is just the banjo and his voice. Then a little bass and a female backing vocal comes in. And it continues to build with some acoustic guitar. Overall, nicely put together. The lyrics are just another love song, saying that he'll be there. There is a feeling of travel, perhaps to meet his gal or perhaps they are drifting together. "Empathy and sympathy are sisters, are drifters like we." Also, "We can drive until daylight than I'll rest." This traveling might be some kind of metaphor for their relationship, even though he gets tired, "We can drive until daybreak, than I'll rest". He determined to be with her. It's more imagery than a story. A little horn comes in the latter part of the song which is nice.
Somewhere Else *** - It starts with a little acoustic guitar and his voice. It has a somber feeling to it. There is some sonic distortion that gently floats over the voice and the guitar. It's a very pretty and haunting song. The lyrics are darker too. "Too afraid to make mistakes and bleed". The song ends with a statement about death. "And I'm not afraid to die, the misconception swells, / but when I die won't be the first time I wish that I was somewhere else." Hence the title.
Two Souls **1/2 - This is a much more upbeat song. It's all very nice, but it sounds like an attempt at commercialism. But it's also hard to argue with his great voice and his songwriting. It only really annoys me in one short section at the end of the chorus. There are also some nice horns. In the middle there is a short flurry of guitar flash. They seem to be driving in this song - perhaps I smell a motif? His two souls are opposites. On will love her and the other one will cause her hurt. Perhaps the metaphor is too facile.
Bird Black Sky *** - It has a menacing name and it starts off with a menacing droning sound. The vocal is added and stays slow and steady. Then it picks up a little. A promising start.The chorus is much more upbeat with a some choppy piano playing. The drone continues to float across the whole song. This also mentions love but there is a kind of foreboding. "do you hear the bells ring? / Do you feel the sky blackening?"
Sons of the Coast **1/2 - This also has a slow start. It starts with a guitar and a keyboard. As the song progresses nothing much really happens. It picks up again and then gets softer. I think I like the softer part, which has a real subtle trumpet playing. The chorus is not very interesting, but has some nice female backing vocals. It's a pretty song with some nice touches but a tad ephemeral. The ending has a nice guitar / trumpet interplay, but doesn't last long enough. The song starts talking about evil men. He or they (there appears to be a brother) are not evil but ghosts.
While the Birches Weep ***1/2 - I like the title of the song. A muted tribal drumming starts the song. The voice sings along with the drumming along with some other songs. Some nice strings come in. I'm always a sucker for strings. The lyrics are difficult as usual. There seems to be a death as there are angels "trying to grab a hold of you" and that he buries her in the yard. The song builds up to a nice ending.
The Road ** - This is a more rocking song, and definitely less subtle that other songs. While his vocal stylings are nice to listen to, this is one of those songs that seem to be trying to get commercial interest. It has a more conventional structure. Not a bad song, but nothing special. The song is about being out on the road. Of course that's probably a metaphor. It might have more to do with escaping and living one's life. "It's easy living for today".
No Heaven **1/2 - This starts out slow. It starts out with a keyboard drone and then a struming guitar and vocals. Though slow, its a fairly haunting song. There's some melancholic imagary here: "Keep crying, it cleanses the soul"."'There's no heaven, only new highways and lonely men'".
Need Not Worry **1/2 - It starts with some bird songs and a minimal acoustic guitar and some static. I haven't really mentioned this much, but this is an example of the light electronics being used on the CD. This is another slow one. It's pretty but there in not enough movement for my taste, at least at first. Whoa! The last third of the song has a lambaste of piano and drum that slams through the song. It's a nice touch. Would have liked to see it last longer. The lyrics are quite difficult this time. There's a bird in the Russian winter. "A pocket knife beat in her chest / hearts may race and out pours sadness / As words spilled warm from her breast." So the bird's heart is a pocket knife and and the spilling warm words might be her song or perhaps her blood. Is she dying? The second half seems to be longing for days of youth and innocence. "Back before we became some body's mistress, / back when we were our father's princess."
Closer listenings always make me enjoy the a musical piece more, though I will not change my initial rating of two and a half stars. If I averaged the rankings, the CD would be closer to three stars. But there are moments that are too slow and there are moments when the artist seems to be "selling out", and the songs, while being pretty good for commercial music, are still too weak.
And now for some videos off his best CD - Songs from a Two Room Chapel. Compare them and see if you don't agree to the superiority of the music.
Shalimar the Clown ***
Author - Salman Rushdie
2005 Random House
pages - 398
This is the third book I've read by Rushdie. Previously, I read Fury and Houron and the Sea of Stories. It's interesting, because my conception of what Rushdie is about has continuously changed. First I read Fury. It started out as a modern book with modern problems, characters etc. Then one of the characters had started a doll business in which an entire universe had been created for the doll characters and large portion of the book was spent describing this fantasy world of the dolls. I loved Fury, but that fantastical portion made me rate the book slightly lower. I preferred the profane portions and less so the mythological portions. Houron is one long fairytale so it is pure mythology. So my view of Mr. Rushdie is someone who has love for Indian mythology. He seems most interested in that element of his writing.
This last book, Shalimar the Clown is also a mix of modernism and mythology. He has some American characters setting and behaviors, but in the portion of the book that is set in Kashmir, he spends much time telling the tales of Kashmirian tales and mythology.
So the book is separated in five chapters each main character getting at least one chapter, and one character gets two. It's an interesting way to present the material, though the other characters are certainly included in chapters besides their own, since they do have relationships with each other. There is:
India / Kashmira - She gets two chapters. She's the daughter of The Ambassador Max Ophuls(see below) and Boonyi (also see below).
Boonyi - She's the wife of Shalimar and the mistress of Max Ophuls.
Shalimar - The husband of Boonyi and the assassin of Max Ophuls.
Max Ophuls - Father to India / Kashmira
And yes it is a little complicated so at this point I should summarize the events in the story.
It starts out with the death of Max Ophuls who is assasined, and India, his daughter, witnesses it. So most of the story is told in the past. Then Rushdie talks about Boonyi and her lover/husband Shalimar back in Kashmir. Their village's main source of income is acting, so there is lots of opportunities for Rushdie to tell old folktales since the village performs these tales. I should say at this point that because ALL the myths and stories are completely foreign to me (Literally and figuratively) they tend to be hard to follow.
Then we find out Max's tale. He is a survivor of Nazi occupied France and eventually becomes Ambassador for the United States. On one of his diplomatic trips, he visits Kashmir and becomes smitten with Boonyi (he is married at this time). Boonyi has dreams of escaping her provincial town even though she is married to Shalimar and leaves her village to become Max's mistress. She gets pregnant and has Kasmira /India. Ophuls and his wife dispose of her and take her baby whose father is Max. Boonyi goes back to her village disgraced and she is considered dead to everyone.
Shalimar, Boonyi's husband is outraged. He avenges to kill her, but before that can happen, he learns to become an assassin by fighting with the Muslim militia during the conflict in Kashmir. A large section of this book does talk about the conflict in Kashmir. I don't think Rushdie ever takes sides. If he does, then it's with the people of Kashmir. He tells of atrocities on the Indian side, who are supposedly protecting the Kashmir people and atrocities of the Muslim side, who are backed by Pakistan. The people of Kashmir are both Muslim and Hindi (not sure of that) and they have always been able to live in peace. But during the confrontation, they begin to take sides. This section also gets a little complicated and hard to follow, but I was able to glean some basic knowledge about the situation there.
The last section of the book takes place after the killing of Ophuls. It's basically how India / Kashmira deals with her fathers death.
I think I have already mentioned some of the problems I had with this book. I say "I" because perhaps they may not be not problems for anyone else but me. The large quantities of folklore as well as some of the discussion about the conflict in Kashmir were too frequently incomprehensible. Now I like history, so normally a discussion about Kashmir would be interesting. But this history is told in a more unorganized and haphazard way. I'm not saying that's bad because this is fiction and it is not a history book. I would expect that it is more effective, in the author's opinion, to give the information when it is necessary to forward or relate it to the plot. But over all, I enjoyed this book immensely.
2005 Random House
pages - 398
This is the third book I've read by Rushdie. Previously, I read Fury and Houron and the Sea of Stories. It's interesting, because my conception of what Rushdie is about has continuously changed. First I read Fury. It started out as a modern book with modern problems, characters etc. Then one of the characters had started a doll business in which an entire universe had been created for the doll characters and large portion of the book was spent describing this fantasy world of the dolls. I loved Fury, but that fantastical portion made me rate the book slightly lower. I preferred the profane portions and less so the mythological portions. Houron is one long fairytale so it is pure mythology. So my view of Mr. Rushdie is someone who has love for Indian mythology. He seems most interested in that element of his writing.
This last book, Shalimar the Clown is also a mix of modernism and mythology. He has some American characters setting and behaviors, but in the portion of the book that is set in Kashmir, he spends much time telling the tales of Kashmirian tales and mythology.
So the book is separated in five chapters each main character getting at least one chapter, and one character gets two. It's an interesting way to present the material, though the other characters are certainly included in chapters besides their own, since they do have relationships with each other. There is:
India / Kashmira - She gets two chapters. She's the daughter of The Ambassador Max Ophuls(see below) and Boonyi (also see below).
Boonyi - She's the wife of Shalimar and the mistress of Max Ophuls.
Shalimar - The husband of Boonyi and the assassin of Max Ophuls.
Max Ophuls - Father to India / Kashmira
And yes it is a little complicated so at this point I should summarize the events in the story.
It starts out with the death of Max Ophuls who is assasined, and India, his daughter, witnesses it. So most of the story is told in the past. Then Rushdie talks about Boonyi and her lover/husband Shalimar back in Kashmir. Their village's main source of income is acting, so there is lots of opportunities for Rushdie to tell old folktales since the village performs these tales. I should say at this point that because ALL the myths and stories are completely foreign to me (Literally and figuratively) they tend to be hard to follow.
Then we find out Max's tale. He is a survivor of Nazi occupied France and eventually becomes Ambassador for the United States. On one of his diplomatic trips, he visits Kashmir and becomes smitten with Boonyi (he is married at this time). Boonyi has dreams of escaping her provincial town even though she is married to Shalimar and leaves her village to become Max's mistress. She gets pregnant and has Kasmira /India. Ophuls and his wife dispose of her and take her baby whose father is Max. Boonyi goes back to her village disgraced and she is considered dead to everyone.
Shalimar, Boonyi's husband is outraged. He avenges to kill her, but before that can happen, he learns to become an assassin by fighting with the Muslim militia during the conflict in Kashmir. A large section of this book does talk about the conflict in Kashmir. I don't think Rushdie ever takes sides. If he does, then it's with the people of Kashmir. He tells of atrocities on the Indian side, who are supposedly protecting the Kashmir people and atrocities of the Muslim side, who are backed by Pakistan. The people of Kashmir are both Muslim and Hindi (not sure of that) and they have always been able to live in peace. But during the confrontation, they begin to take sides. This section also gets a little complicated and hard to follow, but I was able to glean some basic knowledge about the situation there.
The last section of the book takes place after the killing of Ophuls. It's basically how India / Kashmira deals with her fathers death.
I think I have already mentioned some of the problems I had with this book. I say "I" because perhaps they may not be not problems for anyone else but me. The large quantities of folklore as well as some of the discussion about the conflict in Kashmir were too frequently incomprehensible. Now I like history, so normally a discussion about Kashmir would be interesting. But this history is told in a more unorganized and haphazard way. I'm not saying that's bad because this is fiction and it is not a history book. I would expect that it is more effective, in the author's opinion, to give the information when it is necessary to forward or relate it to the plot. But over all, I enjoyed this book immensely.
Thank You for Smoking ***
Seen on DVD
Based on Christopher Buckley's 1994 novel.
Adapted screenplay and director - Jason Reitman
With: Aaron Eckhart, Katie Holmes, Robert Duvall, Rob Lowe, William H. Macy
Sam Elliott, Maria Bello, David Koechner
This is a fairly old film (sorry, the date is not accessible at the moment), so it's no surprise to anyone who might be reading this that it is a good film. This is not new news!
It's not laugh out loud funny, but I could not contain my smirking and grinning through out the whole time. Basically, it's about a fast talking representative for the tobacco industry and the absurd and outrageous thing he says and gets away with.
Well, he has a son, who he takes under his wings and teaches him the trade so to speak. (interesting enough, in an interview on this same DVD, the son plays a much more minor role in the book. It's a Hollywood addition.) Having a son gets at the conscious of Eckhart's character (the spin man) but in ways that might be unexpected. I liked that, because it doesn't follow the audiences expectations. You would expect that Eckhart's character would come around and see the evil of his ways. That doesn't happen - exactly.
In Eckhart's defense of the tobacco industry, I was expecting something so tongue in cheek, that the opposite of what Eckhart said would be the lesson for the audience. But it's not so cut and dry. Definitely, that happens, but there are also some pretty sincere arguments for what he is doing and why - not too many, but it's not a pure lambaste on the tobacco industry.
So to anyone who is reading this, I know that you probably already heard all the buzz on this film when it originally came out. This writing will just be a friendly reminder to go see it if you haven't had a chance. It's by the same director as Juno, so it would be interesting to compare.
Based on Christopher Buckley's 1994 novel.
Adapted screenplay and director - Jason Reitman
With: Aaron Eckhart, Katie Holmes, Robert Duvall, Rob Lowe, William H. Macy
Sam Elliott, Maria Bello, David Koechner
This is a fairly old film (sorry, the date is not accessible at the moment), so it's no surprise to anyone who might be reading this that it is a good film. This is not new news!
It's not laugh out loud funny, but I could not contain my smirking and grinning through out the whole time. Basically, it's about a fast talking representative for the tobacco industry and the absurd and outrageous thing he says and gets away with.
Well, he has a son, who he takes under his wings and teaches him the trade so to speak. (interesting enough, in an interview on this same DVD, the son plays a much more minor role in the book. It's a Hollywood addition.) Having a son gets at the conscious of Eckhart's character (the spin man) but in ways that might be unexpected. I liked that, because it doesn't follow the audiences expectations. You would expect that Eckhart's character would come around and see the evil of his ways. That doesn't happen - exactly.
In Eckhart's defense of the tobacco industry, I was expecting something so tongue in cheek, that the opposite of what Eckhart said would be the lesson for the audience. But it's not so cut and dry. Definitely, that happens, but there are also some pretty sincere arguments for what he is doing and why - not too many, but it's not a pure lambaste on the tobacco industry.
So to anyone who is reading this, I know that you probably already heard all the buzz on this film when it originally came out. This writing will just be a friendly reminder to go see it if you haven't had a chance. It's by the same director as Juno, so it would be interesting to compare.
Friday, July 18, 2008
For Emma, Forever Ago ***1/2
Bon Iver
2008 Aprilbase Publishing
Recorded by Justin Vernon in the hunting cabin, Northwest Wisconsin
Label - Jagjaguwar
Justin Vernon - Most sounds on CD except:
John Dehaven - Trumpet on "Forever"
Rudy Pingrey - Trombone on "Forever"
Christy Smith - Drums and sang on "Flume"
This CD has been getting lots of critical acclaim. I listened to it at a listening station before buying it and I said to myself, "Maybe". I wasn't sure because it is a pretty mellow CD. At least the snippets I heard were pretty mellow. The problem with listening to snippets of music is that it is hard to get a good feeling for the music that you would get when listening to the entire piece. I imagine I might have passed up on some great music just because I couldn't engage suffieciently enough in the 30 seconds allotted time per song.
Normally I stay away from the real slow stuff. I kind of like my music to be mid tempo. Not too mellow, but not too rocking. I like a fuller sound with a variety of instruments. I'm not a big fan of a guy and his guitar and I have outgrown the real rocking stuff. But even though this was mellow, it sounded "catchy" enough to not disregard it immediately, and I put it back in the rack for further consideration. The great reviews kept coming in and with coupon in hand, I told myself, "Why Not?" It would make good music to go to sleep by.
Here is the story. Apparently, Justin Vernon, a musician with another group which I can't recall, had broken up with his girlfriend and retreated to his family cabin in Wisconsin. This CD is the result of his pain. While it's mellow, the songs are still catchy enough and there is enough instrumentation, though minimal, to keep my interest. It reminds me of Micah P. Hinson with a higher voice or even of Bonnie "Prince" Billy with his ability to write engaging songs. I am definitely satisfied to have bought it.
I finally figured out how to add music. The videos are nothing - just lisen to the music.
The Songs:
Flume **** - It typically starts out with an acoustic guitar. There are some sounds scattered through out the song that are background and add to the music without being distracting. A little bass drum kicks in. One of the best cuts on the CD. There is an interlude of some noisy sound effects. Not sure why that was put in there, but it is short lived. The lyrics are fairly oblique. There is no story here, but the imagery and language is beautiful. It's about love, it's about his mother, "I am my mother on the wall, with us all". There is a nice alliteration too, "lapping lakes like leery loons". What ever that means.
Lump Sum **1/2 - This starts out wit a little choral piece, almost medieval. Then the the guitar and bass drum kicks in. It has a kind of repetitive, shuffling sound. It is faster paced than the previous song. The lyrics are almost impossible to decipher here also. It starts out with the narrator "selling" some things.
Skinny Love **** - This starts with more acoustic guitar. He sings the lyrics in a interesting catchy way. Then the drum (bass) kicks in. A very catchy start to the song. The chorus is kind of a departure from his other singing. Most of it is sung in his high voice, but the chorus where he sings, "I told you..." is sung with more emotion. It's effective. Skinny love is a love that is not strong. While this one's a little easier to figure out what he's saying, it's still not easy. Seems to be an angry, bitter song - "staring at the sink of blood and crushed veneer". Most probably, it's a song about his breakup.
Wolves (Act I and II)*** - This one starts out slower. Just a slow, acoustic guitar. The vocals are sung in harmony or at least it seems that way. With his high voice it I could be hearing wrong. According to the credits, there is no one else singing on this song. Of course it could be studio magic. The first half of the song stays pretty mellow, but pretty (probably act I). As I write this the pace does start to pick up (probably act II). Lyrically the song is about his pain and blame (I assume his old lover) and the wolves are around her perhaps protecting her, or perhaps she is unaware of how bad the new people around her are. Or at least that what he thinks.
Blindsided ***1/2- Starts with some electronic noises then a rhythmic guitar comes in. The song slows down for a chorus? (not really sure if it is a chorus, but it definitely changes tempo and and has chorus like catchiness. The lyrics seem to refer to his being blindsided (duh) but he also seems to be trying to see what is happening, yet unsuccessfully, so he is blind to what is happening."I crouch like a crow / contrasting the snow / for the agony, I'd rather know / cause blinded I am blindsided". Apparently the evil he knows is better than the evil he does not know as the saying goes. Again a very nice song. Mellow yet one can still tap their toes to it. For all my eclectic tastes in music, basically, I still need something to which I can tap my toes.
Creature Fear *** - This starts with vocals, a kind of 50's "oooh, ooh, ooh" though prettied up and with elongated oohs. Then the song changes to guitar and voice with a little snare drum. Suddenly, the most rocking part comes, briefly. So it looks if this is going to be one of those slow / fast cycle songs. The fast part is probably the catchier part ( I know, I am over using that word). The creature fear seems to be about their relationship.
Team **1/2 - This song is a little harder. I swear I hear some bass, though there are no credits for it. It could be his computer. I even hear an electric guitar. The bass carries the rhythm, and the drums have a kind of marching sound. This is an instrumental except for some whistles. Nice over all.
For Emma**** - This is also a more up beat song, with some horns and apparently a complete drum kit. This song is written as a play with characters.. There's the narrator, him and her. Though it's a very short play - no more than 12 lines. Her seems to be complaining. "Go find another lover...". The instrumental has the horns taking some nice solo parts.
Re:Stacks**** - This is the longest song coming in at about 6:30. It starts with guitar. This is one of those pretty ones. The chorus is quite nice with some rhyming language that he sings quite nicely, "On your back with your racks as you stack your load" He kind of sings it quickly and the 'ck' sounds have a percussive sound.
I had to change my original rating from 3 to 3 1/2 stars. As I listened to it, I realized how beautiful it was. It's not party music. It's music to chill out to, to spend a lazy day with your favorite girl. I think it's earned all the hype it's gotten.
2008 Aprilbase Publishing
Recorded by Justin Vernon in the hunting cabin, Northwest Wisconsin
Label - Jagjaguwar
Justin Vernon - Most sounds on CD except:
John Dehaven - Trumpet on "Forever"
Rudy Pingrey - Trombone on "Forever"
Christy Smith - Drums and sang on "Flume"
This CD has been getting lots of critical acclaim. I listened to it at a listening station before buying it and I said to myself, "Maybe". I wasn't sure because it is a pretty mellow CD. At least the snippets I heard were pretty mellow. The problem with listening to snippets of music is that it is hard to get a good feeling for the music that you would get when listening to the entire piece. I imagine I might have passed up on some great music just because I couldn't engage suffieciently enough in the 30 seconds allotted time per song.
Normally I stay away from the real slow stuff. I kind of like my music to be mid tempo. Not too mellow, but not too rocking. I like a fuller sound with a variety of instruments. I'm not a big fan of a guy and his guitar and I have outgrown the real rocking stuff. But even though this was mellow, it sounded "catchy" enough to not disregard it immediately, and I put it back in the rack for further consideration. The great reviews kept coming in and with coupon in hand, I told myself, "Why Not?" It would make good music to go to sleep by.
Here is the story. Apparently, Justin Vernon, a musician with another group which I can't recall, had broken up with his girlfriend and retreated to his family cabin in Wisconsin. This CD is the result of his pain. While it's mellow, the songs are still catchy enough and there is enough instrumentation, though minimal, to keep my interest. It reminds me of Micah P. Hinson with a higher voice or even of Bonnie "Prince" Billy with his ability to write engaging songs. I am definitely satisfied to have bought it.
I finally figured out how to add music. The videos are nothing - just lisen to the music.
The Songs:
Flume **** - It typically starts out with an acoustic guitar. There are some sounds scattered through out the song that are background and add to the music without being distracting. A little bass drum kicks in. One of the best cuts on the CD. There is an interlude of some noisy sound effects. Not sure why that was put in there, but it is short lived. The lyrics are fairly oblique. There is no story here, but the imagery and language is beautiful. It's about love, it's about his mother, "I am my mother on the wall, with us all". There is a nice alliteration too, "lapping lakes like leery loons". What ever that means.
Lump Sum **1/2 - This starts out wit a little choral piece, almost medieval. Then the the guitar and bass drum kicks in. It has a kind of repetitive, shuffling sound. It is faster paced than the previous song. The lyrics are almost impossible to decipher here also. It starts out with the narrator "selling" some things.
Skinny Love **** - This starts with more acoustic guitar. He sings the lyrics in a interesting catchy way. Then the drum (bass) kicks in. A very catchy start to the song. The chorus is kind of a departure from his other singing. Most of it is sung in his high voice, but the chorus where he sings, "I told you..." is sung with more emotion. It's effective. Skinny love is a love that is not strong. While this one's a little easier to figure out what he's saying, it's still not easy. Seems to be an angry, bitter song - "staring at the sink of blood and crushed veneer". Most probably, it's a song about his breakup.
Wolves (Act I and II)*** - This one starts out slower. Just a slow, acoustic guitar. The vocals are sung in harmony or at least it seems that way. With his high voice it I could be hearing wrong. According to the credits, there is no one else singing on this song. Of course it could be studio magic. The first half of the song stays pretty mellow, but pretty (probably act I). As I write this the pace does start to pick up (probably act II). Lyrically the song is about his pain and blame (I assume his old lover) and the wolves are around her perhaps protecting her, or perhaps she is unaware of how bad the new people around her are. Or at least that what he thinks.
Blindsided ***1/2- Starts with some electronic noises then a rhythmic guitar comes in. The song slows down for a chorus? (not really sure if it is a chorus, but it definitely changes tempo and and has chorus like catchiness. The lyrics seem to refer to his being blindsided (duh) but he also seems to be trying to see what is happening, yet unsuccessfully, so he is blind to what is happening."I crouch like a crow / contrasting the snow / for the agony, I'd rather know / cause blinded I am blindsided". Apparently the evil he knows is better than the evil he does not know as the saying goes. Again a very nice song. Mellow yet one can still tap their toes to it. For all my eclectic tastes in music, basically, I still need something to which I can tap my toes.
Creature Fear *** - This starts with vocals, a kind of 50's "oooh, ooh, ooh" though prettied up and with elongated oohs. Then the song changes to guitar and voice with a little snare drum. Suddenly, the most rocking part comes, briefly. So it looks if this is going to be one of those slow / fast cycle songs. The fast part is probably the catchier part ( I know, I am over using that word). The creature fear seems to be about their relationship.
Team **1/2 - This song is a little harder. I swear I hear some bass, though there are no credits for it. It could be his computer. I even hear an electric guitar. The bass carries the rhythm, and the drums have a kind of marching sound. This is an instrumental except for some whistles. Nice over all.
For Emma**** - This is also a more up beat song, with some horns and apparently a complete drum kit. This song is written as a play with characters.. There's the narrator, him and her. Though it's a very short play - no more than 12 lines. Her seems to be complaining. "Go find another lover...". The instrumental has the horns taking some nice solo parts.
Re:Stacks**** - This is the longest song coming in at about 6:30. It starts with guitar. This is one of those pretty ones. The chorus is quite nice with some rhyming language that he sings quite nicely, "On your back with your racks as you stack your load" He kind of sings it quickly and the 'ck' sounds have a percussive sound.
I had to change my original rating from 3 to 3 1/2 stars. As I listened to it, I realized how beautiful it was. It's not party music. It's music to chill out to, to spend a lazy day with your favorite girl. I think it's earned all the hype it's gotten.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
